Will Arvind Kejriwal get bail or stay in jail? The Supreme Court decides today

Will Arvind Kejriwal be granted bail? The Supreme Court will decide this morning on his plea following his June arrest by the Central Bureau of Investigation over an alleged liquor excise policy scam. The court will also address a separate petition challenging the CBI’s actions. The verdict for both cases is set to be delivered at 10:30 am. Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Surya Kant expected to issue separate judgments. If the ruling is in his favor. Kejriwal will be released nearly six months after his initial arrest by the Enforcement Directorate. Two months after securing bail for that arrest. He was unable to leave on July 12 due to a subsequent CBI arrest related to the same case. Despite the ED dropping its challenge.

Supreme Court to Rule on Arvind Kejriwal’s Bail Today: Verdict Expected at 10:30 AM

In various forums, including the current Supreme Court hearings, senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, representing Arvind Kejriwal. Has criticized the second arrest as an “insurance” policy intended to keep the AAP leader in jail and his party unsettled before the Delhi elections in February.

Also Read:Sitaram Yechury General Secretary of CPI(M) Passes away

During last week’s final hearing before the court began its deliberation. Singhvi argued that his client had already met the ‘triple test’ legal criteria for bail, as the same court had previously granted him bail in the ED case.In the lead-up to this verdict, the Supreme Court has emphasized the principle established in 1977 by Justice Krishna Iyer: ‘bail is the rule, jail is the exception.’ This principle applies to cases under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), under which Arvind Kejriwal faces charges.

The court has also previously reasoned that while Section 45 of the PMLA introduces two additional conditions for bail.I t cannot override an individual’s fundamental right to liberty. This interpretation suggests that bail should generally be granted to those accused of money laundering, provided other conditions are satisfied.

The court has also previously reasoned that while Section 45 of the PMLA introduces two additional conditions for bail, it cannot override an individual’s fundamental right to liberty. This interpretation suggests that bail should generally be granted to those accused of money laundering, provided other conditions are satisfied.

Also Read:Three additional Haryana BJP leaders resigned following the release of second list